SSA 1.1
Marco Molinaro
molinaro at oats.inaf.it
Thu Jan 8 16:04:05 CET 2015
Hi Pierre,
2015-01-08 15:57 GMT+01:00 Pierre Le Sidaner <pierre.lesidaner at obspm.fr>:
> Hi Marco
>
> If what you ask is when I will modify my validator to take into account
> the specificity of theorical spectra : answe is soon :-)
>
my idea was more on the writing down the errata (note or whatever), but the
validator is of course important.
Marco
I 'll try to push it a bit on the stack I have of "things to do"
> But I have discuss with her directly explaining that as the doc was not
> clear I have not implemented it. But discution on DAL list push me to take
> into account this specific case
>
>
> regards
> Pierre
>
> On 01/08/2015 03:51 PM, Marco Molinaro wrote:
>
>> Hi Pierre, all,
>> I think the errata would be nice, also considering Michele Sanguillon
>> question on the dal list:
>>
>> http://mail.ivoa.net/pipermail/dal/2015-January/007020.html
>>
>> Maybe yours and Michele's discoveries on the SSA-1.1 can be joined in one
>> correction step.
>>
>> Cheers,
>> Marco
>>
>> 2014-11-18 15:35 GMT+01:00 Pierre Le Sidaner <pierre.lesidaner at obspm.fr
>> <mailto:pierre.lesidaner at obspm.fr>>:
>>
>>
>> Thanks Doug
>>
>> That was also my idea of testing errata, that's why I have send
>> the first email also to TCG
>>
>> Regards
>> Pierre
>>
>>
>> On 11/18/2014 03:21 PM, Douglas Tody wrote:
>>
>> The theoretical spectra example was always pretty rough - it
>> would be
>> great if it were updated. Perhaps (for the TCG) this would
>> qualify as
>> an errata? - Doug
>>
>>
>> On Tue, 18 Nov 2014, Carlos Rodrigo wrote:
>>
>> Hi
>>
>> Given that the example for theoretical spectra in the
>> document is based in one of our services, I
>> think that I should say something here... :)
>>
>> Doug's answer has clarified most of the things that I
>> intended to write
>>
>> In fact, there are several metadata that are mandatory and
>> are not in the example:
>>
>> Char.SpatialAxis.Coverage.Location.Value
>> Char.SpatialAxis.Coverage.Bounds.Extent
>> Char.TimeAxis.Coverage.Location.Value
>> Char.SpectralAxis.Coverage.Location.Value
>> Char.SpectralAxis.Coverage.Bounds.Extent
>>
>> The first three ones does not (usually) make sense for
>> theoretical spectra so I think that we can
>> apply what Doug says.
>>
>> The last two ones make sense for theoretical spectra and
>> they are not in the example, so I think
>> that it would be good to add them. In fact, at first
>> sight, I guess that the example was writen so
>> much time ago and it does not reflect some changes in the
>> document, so it would be nice to rewrite
>> it a little. In fact, there are more things that should be
>> changed in the example. For instance,
>> url's are outdated and they don't work (the domain
>> laeff.inta.es <http://laeff.inta.es> does not exist anymore)
>>
>>
>> So, if it is ok, I could write an updated version of the
>> example
>>
>> Carlos
>>
>>
>> On 11/18/2014 02:33 PM, Douglas Tody wrote:
>>
>> Hi Pierre -
>>
>> Section 4.1 of the spec addresses the issue of theory
>> data and notes
>> that some metadata may not have meaning for certain
>> types of data
>> collections such as theory data. However the section
>> talks about query
>> constraints (input parameter semantics) and I agree is
>> not explicit
>> about what to do with the query response. The
>> implication though, and
>> what was intended, is that if metadata such as spatial
>> position is not
>> meaningful for the data collection, these values
>> should be omitted in
>> the query response. Hence your option #2 below
>> applies; metadata is not
>> mandatory (i.e. may be set to null) if not defined for
>> a specific data
>> collection such as as theory data.
>>
>> - Doug
>>
>>
>> On Tue, 18 Nov 2014, Pierre Le Sidaner wrote:
>>
>> Dear IVOA members
>>
>> I am facing a little problem with my SSA validator
>> following the documentation metadata such as
>> Char.SpatialAxis.Coverage.Location.Value are
>> mandatory in the query response
>> but example in the text for response of Theory-SSA
>> omit some of them.
>>
>> My question is :
>> Am I badly reading the documentation ?
>> should we modify the mandatory fields for non
>> "observational" SSA
>> Should we modify the example of Theorical SSA
>>
>> regards
>> Pierre
>>
>> -- ------------------------------
>> -------------------------------------------
>>
>> Pierre Le Sidaner
>> Observatoire de Paris
>>
>> Division Informatique de l'Observatoire
>> Observatoire Virtuel 01 40 51 20 89
>> 61, avenue de l'Observatoire 75014 Paris
>>
>> mailto:pierre.lesidaner at obspm.fr
>> <mailto:pierre.lesidaner at obspm.fr>
>> http://vo.obspm.fr
>>
>> ------------------------------
>> --------------------------------------------
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> -- ------------------------------------------------------------
>> -------------
>> Pierre Le Sidaner
>> Observatoire de Paris
>>
>> Division Informatique de l'Observatoire
>> Observatoire Virtuel 01 40 51 20 89
>> 61, avenue de l'Observatoire 75014 Paris
>>
>> mailto:pierre.lesidaner at obspm.fr <mailto:pierre.lesidaner at obspm.fr>
>> http://vo.obspm.fr
>>
>> ------------------------------------------------------------
>> --------------
>>
>>
>>
>
> --
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Pierre Le Sidaner
> Observatoire de Paris
>
> Division Informatique de l'Observatoire
> Observatoire Virtuel 01 40 51 20 89
> 61, avenue de l'Observatoire 75014 Paris
>
> mailto:pierre.lesidaner at obspm.fr
> http://vo.obspm.fr
>
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.ivoa.net/pipermail/dal/attachments/20150108/f614702f/attachment.html>
More information about the dal
mailing list