SSA 1.1
Pierre Le Sidaner
pierre.lesidaner at obspm.fr
Thu Jan 8 15:57:22 CET 2015
Hi Marco
If what you ask is when I will modify my validator to take into account
the specificity of theorical spectra : answe is soon :-)
I 'll try to push it a bit on the stack I have of "things to do"
But I have discuss with her directly explaining that as the doc was not
clear I have not implemented it. But discution on DAL list push me to
take into account this specific case
regards
Pierre
On 01/08/2015 03:51 PM, Marco Molinaro wrote:
> Hi Pierre, all,
> I think the errata would be nice, also considering Michele Sanguillon
> question on the dal list:
>
> http://mail.ivoa.net/pipermail/dal/2015-January/007020.html
>
> Maybe yours and Michele's discoveries on the SSA-1.1 can be joined in
> one correction step.
>
> Cheers,
> Marco
>
> 2014-11-18 15:35 GMT+01:00 Pierre Le Sidaner
> <pierre.lesidaner at obspm.fr <mailto:pierre.lesidaner at obspm.fr>>:
>
> Thanks Doug
>
> That was also my idea of testing errata, that's why I have send
> the first email also to TCG
>
> Regards
> Pierre
>
>
> On 11/18/2014 03:21 PM, Douglas Tody wrote:
>
> The theoretical spectra example was always pretty rough - it
> would be
> great if it were updated. Perhaps (for the TCG) this would
> qualify as
> an errata? - Doug
>
>
> On Tue, 18 Nov 2014, Carlos Rodrigo wrote:
>
> Hi
>
> Given that the example for theoretical spectra in the
> document is based in one of our services, I
> think that I should say something here... :)
>
> Doug's answer has clarified most of the things that I
> intended to write
>
> In fact, there are several metadata that are mandatory and
> are not in the example:
>
> Char.SpatialAxis.Coverage.Location.Value
> Char.SpatialAxis.Coverage.Bounds.Extent
> Char.TimeAxis.Coverage.Location.Value
> Char.SpectralAxis.Coverage.Location.Value
> Char.SpectralAxis.Coverage.Bounds.Extent
>
> The first three ones does not (usually) make sense for
> theoretical spectra so I think that we can
> apply what Doug says.
>
> The last two ones make sense for theoretical spectra and
> they are not in the example, so I think
> that it would be good to add them. In fact, at first
> sight, I guess that the example was writen so
> much time ago and it does not reflect some changes in the
> document, so it would be nice to rewrite
> it a little. In fact, there are more things that should be
> changed in the example. For instance,
> url's are outdated and they don't work (the domain
> laeff.inta.es <http://laeff.inta.es> does not exist anymore)
>
> So, if it is ok, I could write an updated version of the
> example
>
> Carlos
>
>
> On 11/18/2014 02:33 PM, Douglas Tody wrote:
>
> Hi Pierre -
>
> Section 4.1 of the spec addresses the issue of theory
> data and notes
> that some metadata may not have meaning for certain
> types of data
> collections such as theory data. However the section
> talks about query
> constraints (input parameter semantics) and I agree is
> not explicit
> about what to do with the query response. The
> implication though, and
> what was intended, is that if metadata such as spatial
> position is not
> meaningful for the data collection, these values
> should be omitted in
> the query response. Hence your option #2 below
> applies; metadata is not
> mandatory (i.e. may be set to null) if not defined for
> a specific data
> collection such as as theory data.
>
> - Doug
>
>
> On Tue, 18 Nov 2014, Pierre Le Sidaner wrote:
>
> Dear IVOA members
>
> I am facing a little problem with my SSA validator
> following the documentation metadata such as
> Char.SpatialAxis.Coverage.Location.Value are
> mandatory in the query response
> but example in the text for response of Theory-SSA
> omit some of them.
>
> My question is :
> Am I badly reading the documentation ?
> should we modify the mandatory fields for non
> "observational" SSA
> Should we modify the example of Theorical SSA
>
> regards
> Pierre
>
> --
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Pierre Le Sidaner
> Observatoire de Paris
>
> Division Informatique de l'Observatoire
> Observatoire Virtuel 01 40 51 20 89
> 61, avenue de l'Observatoire 75014 Paris
>
> mailto:pierre.lesidaner at obspm.fr
> <mailto:pierre.lesidaner at obspm.fr>
> http://vo.obspm.fr
>
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>
>
>
>
> --
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Pierre Le Sidaner
> Observatoire de Paris
>
> Division Informatique de l'Observatoire
> Observatoire Virtuel 01 40 51 20 89
> 61, avenue de l'Observatoire 75014 Paris
>
> mailto:pierre.lesidaner at obspm.fr <mailto:pierre.lesidaner at obspm.fr>
> http://vo.obspm.fr
>
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>
--
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Pierre Le Sidaner
Observatoire de Paris
Division Informatique de l'Observatoire
Observatoire Virtuel 01 40 51 20 89
61, avenue de l'Observatoire 75014 Paris
mailto:pierre.lesidaner at obspm.fr
http://vo.obspm.fr
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
More information about the dal
mailing list