ivoatex architecture diagram: fix box widths
Molinaro, Marco
marco.molinaro at inaf.it
Tue Mar 9 10:38:25 CET 2021
Hi Markus, all,
I tried the new archdiag and the recipe for new boxes.
It works backwards with existing role_diagram.xml(s)
as well as with the new "w-additioned" ones.
(I added my comments in the PR on github)
Cheers
Marco
Il giorno lun 8 mar 2021 alle ore 15:59 Markus Demleitner <
msdemlei at ari.uni-heidelberg.de> ha scritto:
> Dear Std+Proc,
>
> On Mon, Jan 25, 2021 at 01:28:30PM +0100, Markus Demleitner wrote:
> > This message is about the architecture diagram, which, with the
> > increasing number of standards, is becoming rather crowded. A simple
> > countermeasure would be to abandon the fixed width of the boxes --
> > this will give the diagram a somewhat less regular appearance, but it
> > will loosen things up a lot.
>
> So, I've now superseded the with-javascript proposal with
> https://github.com/ivoa-std/ivoatex/pull/42, which adds manually
> defined widths to the box definitions. This indeed loosens up the
> map a lot, which so far I've only used to make the "Getting" string
> from l1 visible again: http://docs.g-vo.org/archdiag-l2.svg.
>
> Once we stop centering the boxes (e.g., in the DAL region), we can
> recover enough space for another couple of decades of creating
> standards.
>
> So... could folks review the PR? Getting any sort of feedback would
> be most welcome given the extent of the change.
>
> You might also try if the recipe for adding boxes in
> archdiag-full.xml works for you; also, I believe the XSLT should be
> backwards-compatible, such that existing role_diagram.svg should just
> continue to work. But if I'm wrong there, it'd be great if you
> caught me before we merge this (if we merge it).
>
> Thanks,
>
> Markus
>
--
Marco Molinaro
INAF - Istituto Nazionale di AstroFisica
Osservatorio Astronomico di Trieste
email marco.molinaro at inaf.it
tel. +39 040 3199 152
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.ivoa.net/pipermail/stdproc/attachments/20210309/83fc30cd/attachment.html>
More information about the stdproc
mailing list