skos:notation and AVM

[Rob Seaman]

On Jul 1, 2008, at 3:27 AM, Alasdair Gray wrote:

> In going through the document, I have found that there is now a  
> skos:notation. To my mind, this would be a natural construct to use  
> to model the position of concepts in the avm hierarchy. Does anyone  
> object to this?

Maybe you can comment on why this seems natural, the benefits, any  
significant downsides, etc?  It's hard to imagine I would have any  
objections - but it's also hard to imagine I'll be able to keep up  
with evolving drafts of SKOS.

Rob