skos:notation and AVM

[Alasdair Gray]

Hi,

I am checking that our current vocabularies and the latest draft of  
the skos reference [1] are consistent. One feature, that Norman has  
already corrected, is the updated namespace for skos (it is now http://www.w3.org/2008/05/skos#) 
.

In going through the document, I have found that there is now a  
skos:notation. To my mind, this would be a natural construct to use to  
model the position of concepts in the avm hierarchy. Does anyone  
object to this?

Alasdair

[1] http://www.w3.org/TR/2008/WD-skos-reference-20080609/
[2] http://www.virtualastronomy.org/AVM_Version1.1May312008.pdf

Dr Alasdair J. G. Gray
agray at dcs.gla.ac.uk
http://www.dcs.gla.ac.uk/~agray



-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://www.ivoa.net/pipermail/semantics/attachments/20080701/5887064a/attachment-0001.html>