RegTAP ready for RFC?

[Francoise Genova]

Dear all,

I fully agree with Ray on the necessity to put the successive versions 
of the document on the document repository at these stages of its life 
and at "check points". It is important for external people interested, 
but also for ourselves  to be able to follow the standard history from a 
single point source.

Francoise

Le 02/12/2013 16:41, Ray Plante a écrit :
> On Mon, 2 Dec 2013, Markus Demleitner wrote:
>> What does everyone else say?
> I would encourage moving things forward.
>
>> To encourage comments, I took the bold step to mark the current SVN
>> version PR-21031211 -- which would mean that the thing will have been
>> gone PR (and hence more or less RFC) by next Wednesday.
> Can we get a WD posted to the document repository before a PR?  (That
> needs to go through Gretchen, of course.)
>
> As you know, I'm a big fan of using volute for developing our
> standards docs as it allows for visibility into document evolution "in
> real time".  However, I think it is more appropriate to use the twiki
> and the document repository for storing dated/check-point versions of
> the documents; that is, "internal WDs" go to the twiki and "public"
> WDs go to the document repository.  (In particular, those versions
> that are listed under the "previous versions" list need to in the
> document repository.)  The document repository is particularly
> important for exposure to the larger community that do not subscribe
> to our mailing list.
>
> cheers,
> Ray