RegTAP ready for RFC?

[Gretchen Greene]

Hi Markus, 

I'm in agreement with beginning the formal process and will be able to upload the RegTAP to the repository at your earliest convenience to send the package with WD file + any dependencies.

-Cheers,
Gretchen
________________________________________
From: registry-bounces at ivoa.net [registry-bounces at ivoa.net] on behalf of Ray Plante [rplante at illinois.edu]
Sent: Monday, December 02, 2013 10:41 AM
To: Markus Demleitner
Cc: registry at ivoa.net
Subject: Re: RegTAP ready for RFC?

On Mon, 2 Dec 2013, Markus Demleitner wrote:
> What does everyone else say?

I would encourage moving things forward.

> To encourage comments, I took the bold step to mark the current SVN
> version PR-21031211 -- which would mean that the thing will have been
> gone PR (and hence more or less RFC) by next Wednesday.

Can we get a WD posted to the document repository before a PR?  (That
needs to go through Gretchen, of course.)

As you know, I'm a big fan of using volute for developing our
standards docs as it allows for visibility into document evolution "in
real time".  However, I think it is more appropriate to use the twiki
and the document repository for storing dated/check-point versions of
the documents; that is, "internal WDs" go to the twiki and "public"
WDs go to the document repository.  (In particular, those versions
that are listed under the "previous versions" list need to in the
document repository.)  The document repository is particularly
important for exposure to the larger community that do not subscribe
to our mailing list.

cheers,
Ray