RegTAP ready for RFC?
Ray Plante
rplante at illinois.edu
Mon Dec 2 07:41:25 PST 2013
On Mon, 2 Dec 2013, Markus Demleitner wrote:
> What does everyone else say?
I would encourage moving things forward.
> To encourage comments, I took the bold step to mark the current SVN
> version PR-21031211 -- which would mean that the thing will have been
> gone PR (and hence more or less RFC) by next Wednesday.
Can we get a WD posted to the document repository before a PR? (That
needs to go through Gretchen, of course.)
As you know, I'm a big fan of using volute for developing our
standards docs as it allows for visibility into document evolution "in
real time". However, I think it is more appropriate to use the twiki
and the document repository for storing dated/check-point versions of
the documents; that is, "internal WDs" go to the twiki and "public"
WDs go to the document repository. (In particular, those versions
that are listed under the "previous versions" list need to in the
document repository.) The document repository is particularly
important for exposure to the larger community that do not subscribe
to our mailing list.
cheers,
Ray
More information about the registry
mailing list