standards records in RofR (fwd)

[Ray Plante]

Hi Markus,

On Tue, 2 Apr 2013, Markus Demleitner wrote:
> Though I suspect that's already fixed somewhere, let me mention as
> "problem already reported privately" that, in a harvest as of now
> (<responseDate>2013-04-02T07:30:01Z</responseDate>), the prefix used
> for http://www.ivoa.net/xml/StandardsRegExt/v1.0 is vt rather than,
> as strongly recommended in the spec, vstd:

I thought I had fixed it, but I did see a problem that I that might 
have been letting vt still get through, so I just updated one more 
time.  

> Incidentally, there are schemaLocations missing for VODataService and
> StandardsRegExt, and there's a few minor validations problems in a
> full harvest, but those are not related to the standards records.

RI does not require schemaLocation on harvest (allowing registries 
some flexibility as to where to put them in search results).  I 
believe we're currently inconsistent on this point, including with 
records in the RofR.  Do you have a preference?  I would be happy to 
added them if you would prefer.

> > If you happen to have created a standards record for standard (and I 
> > think maybe someone has--I'm looking in your direction, Markus ;-) and 
> > would like to get that published, go ahead and send it to me.
> 
> Well, if I understand correctly, the RofR should only have only
> standards records that are considered going forward to REC, right?
> The ivo://org.gavo.dc/misc/tapexamples standard record, on the other
> hand, is for an experimental TAP extension and should probably be
> superceded by a something in the TAP record if the TAP examples
> endpoint makes it into the TAP REC.

That's fine.  I couldn't remember what you had produced.  

thanks,
Ray