applications software metadata

[Tony Linde]

Thanks, Gretchen.  

> Anyway...i hope the registry work can pick up the pace.  

Me too. I thought that when I announced at Kyoto that I would stand down as
chair when we rolled out V1.0 of the schemas that everyone would rush to get
it finished :)

T.

> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-registry at eso.org [mailto:owner-registry at eso.org] 
> On Behalf Of Gretchen Greene
> Sent: 31 January 2006 17:12
> To: registry at ivoa.net
> Subject: RE: applications software metadata
> 
> Thanks for the clarification,  when I read DM group...i 
> relate that to the never ending process of all 
> possibilities..  (smile).
> 
> Anyway...i hope the registry work can pick up the pace.  
> There is a need for the RI standard and also some of the new 
> facets of the VOResource, e.g. validationLevel.  It takes a 
> good bit of effort for each upgrade.  
> 
> Applications are really important.  There are so many clients 
> now that depend on the registry and it seems like these 
> clients are spending LOTS of programmatic maintenance on 
> figuring out which service type,  what status of service,  
> WHICH registry interface support,  what mirrors to use,  and 
> IF the switches can be included in the schema,  may alleviate 
> some of the burden.
> 
> Anyway...i think the last round of Registry schemas have 
> faired well...at least the code-generators work well (would 
> like to hear about any JAXB/xjc successes??)
> 
> Goodluck and I'll try to provide some feedback along the way...
> 
> -Gretchen
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-registry at eso.org [mailto:owner-registry at eso.org] 
> On Behalf Of Tony Linde
> Sent: Friday, January 27, 2006 4:52 AM
> To: registry at ivoa.net
> Subject: RE: applications software metadata
> 
> 
> I think you misunderstood me, Gretchen. I meant the DM 
> subgroup of the registry group: the tiger team set up in 
> Kyoto to define a data model for the registry, in particular 
> that needed to register applications.
> 
> We've done sweet fa for about six months! and are only now 
> getting our butts back in gear :)
> 
> Cheers,
> Tony.  
> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: owner-registry at eso.org 
> [mailto:owner-registry at eso.org] On Behalf 
> > Of Gretchen Greene
> > Sent: 26 January 2006 20:23
> > To: registry at ivoa.net
> > Subject: RE: applications software metadata
> > 
> > Okay...i have to either laugh or become very cynical about this 
> > process.
> > 
> > 
> > So to answer my question about having something with the 
> next registry 
> > resource standard release would be an obvious....no.
> >  Customized schemas are looking better...
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: owner-registry at eso.org 
> [mailto:owner-registry at eso.org] On Behalf 
> > Of Tony Linde
> > Sent: Thursday, January 26, 2006 12:56 PM
> > To: registry at ivoa.net
> > Subject: RE: applications software metadata
> > 
> > 
> > That's what the DM subgroup is working towards.
> > 
> > T.
> > 
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: owner-registry at eso.org
> > [mailto:owner-registry at eso.org] On Behalf
> > > Of Gretchen Greene
> > > Sent: 26 January 2006 17:26
> > > To: registry at ivoa.net
> > > Subject: RE: applications software metadata
> > > 
> > > Can we fit a schema extension for this into the next Registry 
> > > standards release?  At least a bare bones version?
> > > 
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: owner-registry at eso.org
> > [mailto:owner-registry at eso.org] On Behalf
> > > Of Robert Hanisch
> > > Sent: Thursday, January 26, 2006 11:22 AM
> > > To: registry at ivoa.net
> > > Subject: applications software metadata
> > > 
> > > 
> > > Here is the sketch of metadata elements describing
> > applications that
> > > we discussed at the IVOA Interop at ESAC last fall.
> > > 
> > > Bob
> > > 
> > > 
> > > 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> 
> 
>