any objections to initiating an RFC period for RM V1.1?

[Ed Shaya]

Then, are we OK with no way to say GalacticI? 
Ed

Arnold Rots wrote:

>Galactic should be equivalent to GalacticII
>
>  - Arnold
>
>Ed Shaya wrote:
>  
>
>>In Frame, is Galactic without II to mean GalacticI or does it still mean 
>>GalacticII or does it mean unknown whether it is I or II?  
>>Ed
>>
>>Robert Hanisch wrote:
>>
>>    
>>
>>>I believe we reached consensus on Resource Metadata V1.1 at the Kyoto
>>>Interop meeting.  If anyone has any objections to the current Working Draft
>>>( http://www.ivoa.net/Documents/latest/RM.html) would you please say so now?
>>>Otherwise Tony will promote the document to a Proposed Recommendation and
>>>initiate the formal RFC period two weeks later (per the agreed practice).
>>>
>>>Thanks,
>>>Bob
>>>
>>>
>>> 
>>>
>>>      
>>>
>--------------------------------------------------------------------------
>Arnold H. Rots                                Chandra X-ray Science Center
>Smithsonian Astrophysical Observatory                tel:  +1 617 496 7701
>60 Garden Street, MS 67                              fax:  +1 617 495 7356
>Cambridge, MA 02138                             arots at head.cfa.harvard.edu
>USA                                     http://hea-www.harvard.edu/~arots/
>--------------------------------------------------------------------------
>  
>