any objections to initiating an RFC period for RM V1.1?
Arnold Rots
arots at head.cfa.harvard.edu
Wed Nov 9 13:17:31 PST 2005
Good question.
I wouldn't mind doing away with GalacticI, but there may be some
catalogs that use it...?
- Arnold
Ed Shaya wrote:
> Then, are we OK with no way to say GalacticI?
> Ed
>
> Arnold Rots wrote:
>
> >Galactic should be equivalent to GalacticII
> >
> > - Arnold
> >
> >Ed Shaya wrote:
> >
> >
> >>In Frame, is Galactic without II to mean GalacticI or does it still mean
> >>GalacticII or does it mean unknown whether it is I or II?
> >>Ed
> >>
> >>Robert Hanisch wrote:
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>>I believe we reached consensus on Resource Metadata V1.1 at the Kyoto
> >>>Interop meeting. If anyone has any objections to the current Working Draft
> >>>( http://www.ivoa.net/Documents/latest/RM.html) would you please say so now?
> >>>Otherwise Tony will promote the document to a Proposed Recommendation and
> >>>initiate the formal RFC period two weeks later (per the agreed practice).
> >>>
> >>>Thanks,
> >>>Bob
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >--------------------------------------------------------------------------
> >Arnold H. Rots Chandra X-ray Science Center
> >Smithsonian Astrophysical Observatory tel: +1 617 496 7701
> >60 Garden Street, MS 67 fax: +1 617 495 7356
> >Cambridge, MA 02138 arots at head.cfa.harvard.edu
> >USA http://hea-www.harvard.edu/~arots/
> >--------------------------------------------------------------------------
> >
> >
>
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
Arnold H. Rots Chandra X-ray Science Center
Smithsonian Astrophysical Observatory tel: +1 617 496 7701
60 Garden Street, MS 67 fax: +1 617 495 7356
Cambridge, MA 02138 arots at head.cfa.harvard.edu
USA http://hea-www.harvard.edu/~arots/
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
More information about the registry
mailing list