any objections to initiating an RFC period for RM V1.1?

[Arnold Rots]

Galactic should be equivalent to GalacticII

  - Arnold

Ed Shaya wrote:
> In Frame, is Galactic without II to mean GalacticI or does it still mean 
> GalacticII or does it mean unknown whether it is I or II?  
> Ed
> 
> Robert Hanisch wrote:
> 
> >I believe we reached consensus on Resource Metadata V1.1 at the Kyoto
> >Interop meeting.  If anyone has any objections to the current Working Draft
> >( http://www.ivoa.net/Documents/latest/RM.html) would you please say so now?
> >Otherwise Tony will promote the document to a Proposed Recommendation and
> >initiate the formal RFC period two weeks later (per the agreed practice).
> >
> >Thanks,
> >Bob
> >
> >
> >  
> >
> 
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
Arnold H. Rots                                Chandra X-ray Science Center
Smithsonian Astrophysical Observatory                tel:  +1 617 496 7701
60 Garden Street, MS 67                              fax:  +1 617 495 7356
Cambridge, MA 02138                             arots at head.cfa.harvard.edu
USA                                     http://hea-www.harvard.edu/~arots/
--------------------------------------------------------------------------