end of comment period for RM V1.0

[Tony Linde]

Hi Bob,

I've issued a last call for RM v1.0. if there are no further comments by
about Tues next week, can I ask you to update the document so everyone has a
couple of days to check it over in its final form.

Thanks,
Tony.  

> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-registry at eso.org [mailto:owner-registry at eso.org] 
> On Behalf Of Robert Hanisch
> Sent: 04 March 2004 19:55
> To: registry at ivoa.net
> Subject: end of comment period for RM V1.0
> 
> The comment period for the RM V1.0 document closed last week. 
>  You will find responses from me, reviewed and endorsed by 
> Tony, on the TWiki at 
> http://www.ivoa.net/twiki/bin/view/IVOA/ResourceMetadataRFC.  
> Before I edit and update the RM document I would like to vet 
> these changes with the Registry WG.
> 
> Here is a brief synopsis of my responses, which you might 
> wish to read with the above TWiki document open at the same time.
> 
> Re/ comment about "independent", I suggest a minor change of 
> wording, as shown.
> 
> Re/ array-valued elements, I would not change Source, 
> ReferenceURL, ObjectDensity, any of the data quality 
> elements, or Format (Format is already an array; the others I 
> would leave as is).  The RM coverage definitions do indeed 
> need to be consistent with the space-time metadata 
> defnitions.  The organizing of the spectral coverage metadata 
> in the schema is not a matter for the RM document.  I will 
> double-check names of Bandpasses and make sure various 
> descriptions are consistent.
> 
> Rename Service.HTTPResults to Service.ResultsMIMEType.
> 
> Re/ "constraint", defer to STC definitions.
> 
> Re/ Convex, delete.
> 
> Re/ Relationship, no change.
> 
> Re/ Entity, refer to Dublin Core definition.
> 
> Re/ IVOA Identifiers, clarify that these most conform to IVOA 
> Identifier specification.
> 
> Re/ "human-readable format", clarify text.
> 
> Re/ Service Metadata examples, fix first example's URL.
> 
> Re/ Capability as not required, do not change.
> 
> Annotate changes in Section 7 of RM document.
> 
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> Bob
>