VOResource v0.10

[Ray Plante]

On Tue, 22 Jun 2004, Matthew Graham wrote:
> I just want to point out one small consequence of: "According to the XML
> Schema standard (Part 1, Sect. 3.3.2, clause 1.2), the use of xsi:type in
> the root element is sufficient for defining its type."
> I will now be able to legally have a Registry entry:
> 
> <conesearch xsi:type="SimpleImageAccess">

Hmm, this example hadn't occured to me.  

Yeah, I was surprised when I discovered this fact (by accident).  With the 
right control over the context in which the records are encoded, we may be 
able to prevent this.  Certainly we can force the use of "resource" in the 
WS context.  I haven't had the chance to fully understand the 
ramifications of this.  

> I hope that we are intending to have a "best uses" guide which says that
> although the root element can be anything, it should really be called
> "resource".

at least.

cheers,
Ray