who is actively developing with VOResource?

[Wil O'Mullane]

actually we are using 
ivo
just for the identifiers so perhaps thats what it should be ..

Can we agree on ivo for everyone ?

wil

On Thu, Nov 20, 2003 at 10:04:24AM -0000, KevinBenson wrote:
> I agree I like "ivoa"
> 
> Oh sorry, I just reread your e-mail and that you said you will be changing
> the updated attributes to duration or datetime which is good otherwise might
> not have posted it to the registry list.  I actually forgot that xml "date"
> is just the date, in java it does include the hours and seconds.  Oh well.
> 
> Yeah I might not bother doing the gateway if your registry service will be
> returning it just like the schema.  If you do end up putting the schema in
> the wsdl, love to see it. :)
> 
> Kevin
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-registry at eso.org [mailto:owner-registry at eso.org]On Behalf Of
> Wil O'Mullane
> Sent: 19 November 2003 14:30
> To: Sebastien Derriere
> Cc: Ray Plante; registry at ivoa.net
> Subject: Re: who is actively developing with VOResource?
> 
> 
> >
> >   In case 'ivoa' is not the proper prefix, what should it be?
> The others are using 'vor' at the mo ..
> It would be nice to have the same everywhere
> But I like ivoa
> 
>