resource identifiers

Tony Linde ael at star.le.ac.uk
Thu May 29 09:58:10 PDT 2003


Thanks, Ray. I'll be mostly bogged down until Monday (then I've got one day
to look at the planning for the next development iteration of AstroGrid for
a meeting on Tuesday!) so I'll try to put more time into the RSM/RM and
'resources=services' threads next week.

Cheers,
Tony. 

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Ray Plante [mailto:rplante at poplar.ncsa.uiuc.edu] 
> Sent: 29 May 2003 17:26
> To: registry at ivoa.net
> Subject: RE: resource identifiers
> 
> 
> Hey Tony, Tom,
> 
> With your last email, your point was starting to sink in, and Tom's 
> comments helped crystalize it.  Thus, I think it makes sense 
> to drop the 
> RecordKey from this proposal.  I was a nice model; however, 
> it's not clear 
> that it would necessarily be the right one when we got to the 
> point of 
> using it.  
> 
> I just got off the phone from our NVO metadata working group 
> telecon.  I 
> had put this identifier topic on the agenda to get more input 
> specificly 
> on the RecordKey issue.  We never got that far, but I did get 
> an earful 
> about the rest of the proposal.  Nothing terribly tragic, but 
> there is 
> some additional drawing board work being recommended.  I'm 
> going to let 
> the comments ferment a bit, but then I'll try to synthesize a 
> summary.  
> 
> cheers,
> Ray
> 



More information about the registry mailing list