resource identifiers
Tony Linde
ael at star.le.ac.uk
Thu May 29 09:58:10 PDT 2003
Thanks, Ray. I'll be mostly bogged down until Monday (then I've got one day
to look at the planning for the next development iteration of AstroGrid for
a meeting on Tuesday!) so I'll try to put more time into the RSM/RM and
'resources=services' threads next week.
Cheers,
Tony.
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Ray Plante [mailto:rplante at poplar.ncsa.uiuc.edu]
> Sent: 29 May 2003 17:26
> To: registry at ivoa.net
> Subject: RE: resource identifiers
>
>
> Hey Tony, Tom,
>
> With your last email, your point was starting to sink in, and Tom's
> comments helped crystalize it. Thus, I think it makes sense
> to drop the
> RecordKey from this proposal. I was a nice model; however,
> it's not clear
> that it would necessarily be the right one when we got to the
> point of
> using it.
>
> I just got off the phone from our NVO metadata working group
> telecon. I
> had put this identifier topic on the agenda to get more input
> specificly
> on the RecordKey issue. We never got that far, but I did get
> an earful
> about the rest of the proposal. Nothing terribly tragic, but
> there is
> some additional drawing board work being recommended. I'm
> going to let
> the comments ferment a bit, but then I'll try to synthesize a
> summary.
>
> cheers,
> Ray
>
More information about the registry
mailing list