Rwp01/Rwp05-Suggestions for doc stds

[Tony Linde]

Hi Markus,

> 1. Are these doc standards intended for use by all IVO 
> working groups? (I would hope so.)

The original idea was for the standard to apply to the documents created
by the Registry WG but I was alaso going to submit the recommendations
to the exec for approval as a general set of standards. Indeed, if we
adapt the W3C, GGF or similar standard, there's no reason why this
should not be the case.

> 2. Did we define how to distinguish between science cases, use cases, 
> and test cases?

The people involved in Rwp02 will define this as part of the scope
document. Certainly there would never be any enforced 1:1 relationship.

Cheers,
Tony. 

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Markus Dolensky [mailto:Markus.Dolensky at eso.org] 
> Sent: 24 March 2003 16:30
> To: 'Registry_Ivoa_List'
> Subject: Re: Rwp01/Rwp05-Suggestions for doc stds
> 
> 
> Hi Tony & Bob,
> 
> since I haven't been at the meeting in London, but noticed that the 
> technical leads are supposed to take care of
> - "Rwp05: Implementation coordination"
> let me chip in two questions:
> 
> 1. Are these doc standards intended for use by all IVO 
> working groups? (I would hope so.)
> 
> 2. Did we define how to distinguish between science cases, use cases, 
> and test cases?
> Are there relationships in that there should be >=1 use case 
> per science 
> case and >=1 test case per use case?
> 
> Cheers,
> Markus
> 
> +---
> | Markus Dolensky   Mailto:Markus.Dolensky at eso.org
> | AVO Technical Lead          Web: www.euro-vo.org
> | Voice: ++49 89 32006/261  Fax: ++49 89 32006/480
> +---
> 
>