Various minor problems in VO-DML repo

[Paul Harrison]

> On 23 Feb 2023, at 07:45, Markus Demleitner <msdemlei at ari.uni-heidelberg.de> wrote:
> 
> And lugging the old minor versions around does have a price tag.  For
> instance, these minor-versioned URIs may tempt people into putting
> these into MIVOT's MODEL/@url.   Whether or not that's bad is an
> interesting question (which perhaps also should be addressed in
> MIVOT).  If this were XML, it'd be a disaster.

It has already got bad - there were explicit absolute URLs between models that were stored and developed in Volute that broke
when they were moved to GitHub - this is why I am advocating only referring to models by name and then looking for the models using the rules that I proposed earlier in the thread. It can be thought of that there is an vo-dml namespace in which models have unique names - note that only the name is used for referencing so that in fact in this scheme the version is only informational - if a radical change is made to a model it might have to be called something else.

Paul.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.ivoa.net/pipermail/dm/attachments/20230223/2322974a/attachment-0001.htm>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: smime.p7s
Type: application/pkcs7-signature
Size: 2893 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://mail.ivoa.net/pipermail/dm/attachments/20230223/2322974a/attachment-0001.p7s>