Provenance DM: WD stage ended

[François Bonnarel]

Ole,

I have nothing to add to the previous answer. ProvTAP will come in time 
and will have to adapt to the new ProvDM as long as this one allows 
correct description of provenace metadata in various contexts.

ProvTAP is anyway a DAL spec proposal BASED on ProvDM, but it's another 
project.

Regards

François



Le 18/07/2019 à 12:28, Ole Streicher a écrit :
> Hi Francois,
>
> in my review
>
> <http://mail.ivoa.net/pipermail/dm/2019-June/005852.html>
>
> I listed a number of structural differences between the current ProvTAP
> implementation and the Provenance Working Draft. I was asking for
> confirmation that ProvTAP can be changed to be conform to the model
>
> At least one of them is *not* a minor change.
>
> Again: Can you confirm that ProvTAP can (and will) be made fully conform
> to the Provenance datamodel?
>
> This question is still unanswered, even after serveral attempts to get a
> confirmation.
>
> Best regards
>
> Ole
>
> On 18.07.19 12:09, François Bonnarel wrote:
>> Le 18/07/2019 à 11:58, Ole Streicher a écrit :
>>> Hi Francois,
>>>
>>> On 18.07.19 11:45, François Bonnarel wrote:
>>>> We need some feedback on this spec by making it worked in practice.
>>> The ProvTAP is actually such an important way to make it work in
>>> practice. Therefore I asked you for feedback how the current draft
>>> affects the upcoming ProvTAP standard, and to confirm that it can be
>>> implemented completely.
>>>
>>> The answer was (as all the time in the WD process): silence. Complete
>>> ignorance of my review.
>> This is absolutely not true, Ole. I answered you that I was working on
>> creating a database of provenance metadata for HST HiPS tiles and their
>> progenitors. More than 150000 entities, 50000 activities, etc;;; and
>> that it was not time for me to check the (small) consequences of the new
>> post-Paris ProvDM draft for The ProvTAP specification. This will come in
>> time.
>>> Best regards
>>>
>>> Ole