Provenance DM: WD stage ended

[Ole Streicher]

Hi Francois,

in my review

<http://mail.ivoa.net/pipermail/dm/2019-June/005852.html>

I listed a number of structural differences between the current ProvTAP
implementation and the Provenance Working Draft. I was asking for
confirmation that ProvTAP can be changed to be conform to the model

At least one of them is *not* a minor change.

Again: Can you confirm that ProvTAP can (and will) be made fully conform
to the Provenance datamodel?

This question is still unanswered, even after serveral attempts to get a
confirmation.

Best regards

Ole

On 18.07.19 12:09, François Bonnarel wrote:
> Le 18/07/2019 à 11:58, Ole Streicher a écrit :
>> Hi Francois,
>>
>> On 18.07.19 11:45, François Bonnarel wrote:
>>> We need some feedback on this spec by making it worked in practice.
>> The ProvTAP is actually such an important way to make it work in
>> practice. Therefore I asked you for feedback how the current draft
>> affects the upcoming ProvTAP standard, and to confirm that it can be
>> implemented completely.
>>
>> The answer was (as all the time in the WD process): silence. Complete
>> ignorance of my review.
> This is absolutely not true, Ole. I answered you that I was working on
> creating a database of provenance metadata for HST HiPS tiles and their
> progenitors. More than 150000 entities, 50000 activities, etc;;; and
> that it was not time for me to check the (small) consequences of the new
> post-Paris ProvDM draft for The ProvTAP specification. This will come in
> time.
>>
>> Best regards
>>
>> Ole
>