Prov-WD: Type mismatch for "unit" between text and figures

[Ole Streicher]

Mark pointed out that "ucd" is not a valid VO-DML type (I have misread
the standard here); so the correct type for the UCD is (probably?)
string. The corrected patch is attached.

Best

Ole

On 12.07.19 13:56, Ole Streicher wrote:
> Hi again,
> 
> as a followup here: UCD is similar in a way that there exists a "ucd" 
> primitiveType in VO-DML that should be used here instead of the generic 
> string. Also, for both cases the description should make clear that 
> using the VO-DML types instead of a string is not optional, so in 
> 
> unit | string | physical unit, see […] for recommended unit representation
> 
> the "recommended unit representation" should be removed. And, finally
> this is not limited to physical units; I would replace the "phycical"
> by "IVOA".
> 
> A patch that changes both types, makes them mandatory and replaces the
> "physical" is attached.
> 
> Best
> 
> Ole
> 
> On 27.06.19 09:26, Ole Streicher wrote:
>> Hi all,
>>
>> the attributes "unit" in ValueDescription and ParameterDescription is of
>> type "string" in the tables (Table 18, pg.28 and Table 20, pg. 31), but
>> "Unit" in the figures. This should be harmonized.
>>
>> Best regards
>>
>> Ole
>>

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: 0001-Fix-type-and-description-of-ucd-and-unit-attributes.patch
Type: text/x-patch
Size: 2833 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://mail.ivoa.net/pipermail/dm/attachments/20190714/b212923e/attachment.bin>