Spectral DM 2.0: TCG review feedback

[CresitelloDittmar, Mark]

Severin,

The Spectral data model has no dependence on any of the access protocols.
There is mention of SSA (and TAP) in examples of a possible usage for
certain elements, I found no need to mention AccessData or FAP.  SSA is
certainly dependent on Spectrum, and may be due for a revision/review when
Spectral becomes a REC, where it may incorporate elements of FAP and/or
AccessData.

Hope that helps.
Mark


On Fri, Feb 6, 2015 at 5:08 PM, Gaudet, Severin <
Severin.Gaudet at nrc-cnrc.gc.ca> wrote:

> Hi Mark
>
> Thank you for the updated document. A few things come to mind as I look as
> this version:
>
>    - I know we iterated on the architecture diagram but I see both FAP
>    and AccessData on the diagram without any corresponding mention in the
>    text. This may be my mistake. They should either be mentioned in the text
>    or removed from the diagram. If the latter, I will edit and regenerate the
>    diagram. Please let me know.
>    - Most of the comments in the TCG review where from Markus. Jesus or
>    Omar should ask him to review your responses to his comments and ask him to
>    approve (or otherwise).
>    - The only outstanding WG from the TCG review that has yet to indicate
>    approval or otherwise is Apps. In the TCG telecon yesterday, Pierre
>    committed to reviewing the document promptly. I have cc'ed him on this
>    message so he can review the latest version.
>
>
> Séverin
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.ivoa.net/pipermail/dm/attachments/20150207/e157c27f/attachment.html>