Spectral DM 2.0: TCG review feedback

[Gaudet, Severin]

Hi Mark

Thank you for the updated document. A few things come to mind as I look as this version:

 *   I know we iterated on the architecture diagram but I see both FAP and AccessData on the diagram without any corresponding mention in the text. This may be my mistake. They should either be mentioned in the text or removed from the diagram. If the latter, I will edit and regenerate the diagram. Please let me know.
 *   Most of the comments in the TCG review where from Markus. Jesus or Omar should ask him to review your responses to his comments and ask him to approve (or otherwise).
 *   The only outstanding WG from the TCG review that has yet to indicate approval or otherwise is Apps. In the TCG telecon yesterday, Pierre committed to reviewing the document promptly. I have cc'ed him on this message so he can review the latest version.

Séverin

Le Feb 6, 2015 à 11:20 AM, CresitelloDittmar, Mark <mdittmar at cfa.harvard.edu<mailto:mdittmar at cfa.harvard.edu>> a écrit :

All,

I've completed the SpectralDM document changes.
The new file has been uploaded to the "Documents and Standards" page, so it should appear there fairly soon.

I also annotated the RFC twiki page comments:
  http://wiki.ivoa.net/twiki/bin/view/IVOA/Spectral2RFC

and updated the Volute repository:
  https://volute.googlecode.com/svn/trunk/projects/dm/SpectralDM-2.0/doc/rc/PR-SpectralDM-2.0-20150206.pdf

Mark


On Tue, Nov 25, 2014 at 1:07 PM, CresitelloDittmar, Mark <mdittmar at cfa.harvard.edu<mailto:mdittmar at cfa.harvard.edu>> wrote:
All,

Following up on the Banff action item, I've updated the twiki page:
  http://wiki.ivoa.net/twiki/bin/view/IVOA/Spectral2RFC

with responses to the TCG feedback comments put forward by the Registry working group.  I tried to colorize my items in green, but they didn't all work.. I did preface my remarks with "MCD:" as well.

There is an open question which I will need to resolve before completing the document update.  The question effects the Cube work as well, so isn't a wasted discussion.
  ** What convention to use for plural attributes**
    I have used the convention of making the attribute plural, with a singular datatype.
      eg: Curation.references: String

    which indicates that Curation holds a list of 'references' of type String.  However, this
    also looks like it says " provide all references using a single string.. using some separator".

Please take a look, I will proceed making the indicated changes to the document.
Mark




-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.ivoa.net/pipermail/dm/attachments/20150206/e52b7969/attachment.html>