Fwd: Re: Cube/ImageDM - new diagram set.

[CresitelloDittmar, Mark]

FYI..

I'm going to splinter responses to some of these topics into new threads,
so that I can tag them in the twiki, and isolate them from this very long
general thread.

Mark



On Fri, May 2, 2014 at 7:43 AM, Douglas Tody <dtody at nrao.edu> wrote:

> On Fri, 2 May 2014, Louys Mireille wrote:
>
>> I would just insure that the Characterisation DM is still in agreement.
>>
>
> The same point should be made about the SpectralDM 2.0.  I just checked,
> and the Utypes in the latest draft do not agree with ObsCore or Char.
>
> There was a time once, about 3 years ago, when we were trying to fast
> track an update of the SpectrumDM to a generalized SpectralDM and wanted
> compatibility with the existing standards and implementations at the
> time.  However if are still now finalizing SpectralDM 2.0, and have
> decided that ImageDM should extend ObsCore, I suggest that the new
> SpectralDM should do so as well.
>
> All of these primary data models - ObsCore/Char/ObsTAP, ImageDM, and
> SpectralDM, should at this point share the same core data model based
> upon the latest Char2 Utypes.  We already pretty much reached that point
> last fall.
>
>         - Doug
>
>
>
>
> On Fri, 2 May 2014, Louys Mireille wrote:
>
>
>>
>>
>> -------- Message original --------
>> Sujet:  Re: Cube/ImageDM - new diagram set.
>> Date :  Fri, 02 May 2014 11:27:38 +0200
>> De :    Louys Mireille <mireille.louys at unistra.fr>
>> Pour :  CresitelloDittmar, Mark <mdittmar at cfa.harvard.edu>
>>
>>
>>
>> Hi Mark,  Hi DMers,
>>
>> Thank you Mark for this careful improvement and follow up of Image/DM.
>>
>> I haven't check your update in details yet .
>> I would just insure that the Characterisation DM is still in agreement.
>> That should be the case , because syserror and staterror inside Accuracy
>> were based on the STC object you rely on .
>> Same for Resolution.
>>
>> About the term "Uncertainty", which is new , I think we should use
>> Accuracy which already exist instead.
>> Same concepts with two different names might lose our standard readers /
>> implementers .
>>
>> Is it really a new concept?
>>
>> best wishes , Mireille
>>
>> Le 30/04/2014 20:31, CresitelloDittmar, Mark a écrit :
>>
>>> All,
>>>
>>> I have, updated the Volute Cube model repository.
>>> Some diagrams (STC/STCMod) plus two new ones (STC SubstitutionGroups,
>>> STCMod ErrorModel)
>>>
>>> Changes are:
>>>   + discussions with Arnold (off list), pointed out that the error model
>>> used was insufficient, more than 'interval' was needed.
>>>      So, I went back into STC and pulled out the substitution groups
>>> used there (CERROR, CRESOLUTION, etc).  I then
>>>      based a new datatype suite (Uncertainty), on some of Arnold's newer
>>> work.
>>>      STCMod AxisCoordinate objects now use these objects for sysError,
>>> statError, resolution, bin.
>>>   + the ivoa:datatypes discussion showed that I should separate Vector
>>> from AtomicValue.  Doing so effected some structure
>>>      in the AxisCoordinates.  Also added Matrix type(s) to replace
>>> STC:double4Type and STC:double9Type.
>>>
>>> Mark
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On Wed, Apr 23, 2014 at 4:49 PM, CresitelloDittmar, Mark <
>>> mdittmar at cfa.harvard.edu <mailto:mdittmar at cfa.harvard.edu>> wrote:
>>>
>>>     All,
>>>
>>>     I have updated the Volute repository..
>>>     Several diagrams, the modelio save-set, and the XMI files.
>>>
>>>     Changes are:
>>>       + made a sweep of the models, replacing URI types with anyURI.
>>> Removed URI from my ivoaTypes model which was redundant with anyURI.
>>>       + corrected some errors I found in my STC interpretation while
>>>     reviewing the VO-DML version of the same.
>>>       + XMI 2.4.1 - export does not include Modelio annotations.  The
>>>     EMF3.0 export does.
>>>
>>>     Mark
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://www.ivoa.net/pipermail/dm/attachments/20140502/08b3241a/attachment-0001.html>