TAPRegExt Erratum

[Brian Major]

Hi Markus and all,

One thing I noticed about this guinea pig is that the status of the note
is not captured in the document.  As per Francoise's draft on the
proposed procedure, the note goes from "Draft Proposed Note", to
"Proposed Endorsed Note", then to "Endorsed Note".  As it stands,
the Status of the Document section only identifies it as a note.
But, since this is to be a lightweight process, perhaps the note status
can be portrayed by how/where the note is hosted (twiki, etc..) and
how it is communicated to the interested parties.

On a similar note, having a section named "Proposed Change"
would not make as much sense once the note is endorsed, and
could be interpreted as something yet to be accepted.  I wonder if
language could be chosen that would make sense in all three
statuses so that the document template need not change upon
status change.

Cheers,
Brian

On Tue, Sep 30, 2014 at 11:51 PM, Francoise Genova <
francoise.genova at astro.unistra.fr> wrote:

> As a complement to Markus' email, you can find the draft proposed
> procedure for errata here:
>
> http://wiki.ivoa.net/twiki/bin/view/IVOA/DocStd13
>
> in Section 3 of the document. The document is still a Note and by no way
> a standard yet. As explained by Markus, the Erratum for TAPRegExt will
> be used as test/reference implementation.
>
> Cheers
>
> Francoise
>
> Le 01/10/2014 07:45, Markus Demleitner a écrit :
> > Dear DAL,
> >
> > As a guinea pig for how to do Errata, and also as a prerequiste for
> > RegTAP, here's a draft Erratum for TAPRegExt as discussed earlier
> > this year:
> >
> > http://docs.g-vo.org/TREErr1.pdf
> >
> > It's also in volute at
> >
> https://volute.googlecode.com/svn/trunk/projects/registry/tapregext-erratum1
> >
> >
> > This is technically written as a Note for now; later, this would
> > probably be an (internal) draft erratum, but I'd rather only update
> > ivoatex to support such concepts once we are reasonably sure this is
> > how we want to do Errata.
> >
> > As we can't really pass RegTAP until this is somehow "in", I'd like
> > to speed things up a bit; in particular, I'd like to move this to
> > (non-internal) draft (and we've yet to work out what that means for the
> > document repository) fairly soon after Banff.
> >
> > So, if you care about TAP service descriptions and/or an Erratum
> > process for the IVOA, please have a look and let me/us know what you
> > think, if appropriate also over on DocStd.
> >
> > Thanks,
> >
> >         Markus
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.ivoa.net/pipermail/dal/attachments/20141006/c0636fba/attachment.html>