TAPRegExt Erratum
Markus Demleitner
msdemlei at ari.uni-heidelberg.de
Tue Oct 7 03:00:34 CEST 2014
Brian,
On Mon, Oct 06, 2014 at 05:43:44PM -0600, Brian Major wrote:
> One thing I noticed about this guinea pig is that the status of the note
> is not captured in the document. As per Francoise's draft on the
> proposed procedure, the note goes from "Draft Proposed Note", to
> "Proposed Endorsed Note", then to "Endorsed Note". As it stands,
Yeah -- as I said I'd have to update ivoatex to support the various
new types, which I'd rather do only if we are reasonably sure this is
where we want to go; imagine the status is "Draft Erratum" for the
time being.
> On a similar note, having a section named "Proposed Change"
> would not make as much sense once the note is endorsed, and
True.
> could be interpreted as something yet to be accepted. I wonder if
> language could be chosen that would make sense in all three
> statuses so that the document template need not change upon
> status change.
Well, turns out I'm wondering, too. I've tentatively made the
section header "Erratum Content" now. Improvement ideas are welcome.
Cheers,
Markus
More information about the dal
mailing list