TAPRegExt revision

[Markus Demleitner]

Dear colleagues,

On Mon, Jun 02, 2014 at 11:12:41AM +0100, Mark Taylor wrote:
> your changes (a) and (b) sound like they could be reasonably be cast
> as "errata" rather than actual (even minor) changes to the standard.
> 
> If that's the case, then the document and schema version number need
> not change.
> 
> The TCG started to agree on a relatively lightweight formal process
> for errata at the F2F meeting in Madrid.  I'm not sure that all the
> details of that process have been worked out (IIRC a new DocStd
> document is under preparation), but this alteration to TAPRegExt
> would seem like a good candidate for an early client of it.

I'm not at all wild about producing a new TAPRegExt version, so I'd
be delighted if we could make do with two errata.  However, the
change of vr:IdentifierURI to xs:anyURI is setting a precedent that
people might find objectionable -- it would be a pity if that
derailed the effort to have errata.

So -- if you consider protesting the IdentifierURI to anyURI change
within an erratum, please speak up now.

Otherwise, I'll ask Francoise how to proceed with issuing errata.

Cheers,

        Markus