[obs-tap] draft summary topic 2 : Representing Utypes in Obstap implementation

[François Bonnarel]

Le 18/03/2011 18:54, Mireille Louys a écrit :
> Topic 2 : Representing Utypes in Obstap implementation
>
> This topic is much more general than the Obstap effort.
> I think more discussion and study of the life cycle of a Utype string 
> in applications , protocols and circulating documents is needed to 
> decide which strategy to adopt for Utype Case: ( lower, Camel , etc.) .
> Data base are allowed to store strings as they need, but lisibility is 
> important for users/developers.
> I hope this topic can be discussed in DM or more general session in 
> Napoli.
Sure we have to make some progress on utypes syntax, storage and usage 
in napoli, if interoperability via
Data models is to be taken serious.
>
> Please tell your opinion on the list
> --ML
>
>