HiPS standardization - next step...

[Tom Donaldson]

Hello Pierre,

Although this comment is a little late, I wanted to mention that I also agree with Thomas’ proposal.

Regards,
Tom


On Apr 7, 2016, at 8:12 AM, Pierre Fernique <Pierre.Fernique at astro.unistra.fr<mailto:Pierre.Fernique at astro.unistra.fr>> wrote:


Dear HiPS contributors,

I agree with the Thomas Boch's proposal, confirmed by Markus.
As they are no more reactions, we could say that we have reached a consensus that I resume in this terms:

"A HiPS creator may declare in the VO registry each individual HiPS that he created, but only with the access interface(s) depending of himself (ie - master url)."

I precise that this declaration is independent of the HiPS server VO registry declaration already validaded in our previous mail thread.

Thanks for you contribution,
Pierre



Le 31/03/2016 11:12, Markus Demleitner a écrit :

[Thomas Boch]
To summarize my point of view: we should at least allow and let HiPS
> creators declare their individual HiPS with the associated master URL, as
> this would allow for discovery of HiPS through RegTAP for instance.


Exactly -- this is what the above proposal manages.



>

Le 29/03/2016 19:07, Pierre Fernique a écrit :

The next question:

One point is still in debate (indenpently to the 3 points above) :

Do we also allow the VO registry declaration of individual HiPS as individual "resource" ? (to correctly catch this point, you may do the parallel with the declaration of VizieR (and clone of VizieR) - as catalog servers - and the declaration of each individual catalog - as resources).

And if we say yes, does this declaration have to be done by the creator of the HiPS ? or by the publisher(s) of the HIPS ?


-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.ivoa.net/pipermail/apps/attachments/20160407/1d9cf038/attachment.html>