HiPS standardization - next step...

[Pierre Fernique]

Dear HiPS contributors,

I agree with the Thomas Boch's proposal, confirmed by Markus.
As they are no more reactions, we could say that we have reached a 
consensus that I resume in this terms:

/"A HiPS creator may declare ///in the VO registry/ each individual HiPS 
that he created, but only with the access interface(s) depending of 
himself (ie - master url)."

/I precise that this declaration is independent of the HiPS server VO 
registry declaration already validaded in our previous mail thread.

Thanks for you contribution,
Pierre



Le 31/03/2016 11:12, Markus Demleitner a écrit :
>> [Thomas Boch]
>> To summarize my point of view: we should at least allow and let HiPS
>> >creators declare their individual HiPS with the associated master URL, as
>> >this would allow for discovery of HiPS through RegTAP for instance.
> Exactly -- this is what the above proposal manages.
>
>> >

Le 29/03/2016 19:07, Pierre Fernique a écrit :
>
> *The next question:****
> *
>
> One point is still in debate (indenpently to the 3 points above)**:
>
> /Do we also allow the VO registry declaration of individual HiPS as 
> individual "resource" ? (to correctly catch this point, you may do the 
> parallel with the declaration of VizieR (and clone of VizieR) - as 
> catalog servers - and the declaration of each individual catalog - as 
> resources)./
>
> /And if we say yes, does this declaration have to be done by the 
> *creator* of the HiPS ? or by the *publisher(s)* of the HIPS ?//
> /
>

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.ivoa.net/pipermail/apps/attachments/20160407/1282fdf5/attachment.html>