VOEvent 20110215 notes

Bob Denny rdenny at dc3.com
Fri Mar 18 18:06:28 PDT 2011


Me:
> I would strongly suggest we explicitly adopt the date/time format as understood
> by XML (type="xs:dateTime") [...]
You:
> Will reword, but explicit adoption is a broader IVOA issue than VOEvent.

I want to be sure that everyone knows that accepting anything but the XML
date/time format will invalidate the ability to use schema-driven validation,
construction, and/or object-code-binding. If the schema declares that something
is type="xs:dateTime" then it is an error for the data in that position to be
other than type="xs:dateTime" (whatever that means).

I don't see why it is controversial that type="xs:dateTime" means
type="xs:dateTime". :-)

  -- Bob


More information about the voevent mailing list