0MQ: The Intelligent Transport Layer

[Matthew Graham]

Hi John,

Several projects are using Jabber in-house so there is whatever infrastructure they have. However, in terms of general user stuff, it pretty much is what we wrote for VOEventNet which should just need updating.

	Cheers,

	Matthew


On Dec 20, 2011, at 5:14 PM, John Swinbank wrote:

> Hello,
> 
> Naive question: what existing Jabber infrastructure is there?
> 
> As of now, there's nothing at <http://www.voevent.org/> which refers to Jabber. Readers who want to "get started with… subscribing to streams" are directed to SkyAlert (which – correct me if I'm wrong – is all web based) or to DC3 Dakota (which only covers the simple TCP transport).
> 
> Googling finds me <http://voeventnet.caltech.edu/software/index.html>, but I'm not sure how seriously to take that: my understanding was that VOEventNet is defunct. At any rate, I tried the Java client and didn't get much sense out of it (specifying "jabber.server=moriori.cacr.caltech.edu" as per the help causes it to return "Could not connect to null:5222.: (504)").
> 
> Any other pointers appreciated.
> 
> Cheers,
> 
> John
> 
> On 20 Dec 2011, at 23:51, Matthew Graham wrote:
> 
>> Hi,
>> 
>> Agreed but considerations should include:
>> 
>> - Is there conceptually anything wrong with the existing infrastructure?
>> - Is it just a case that the current tools are not good enough and no-one has been bothered enough to dedicate some time to sorting this out?
>> - What exactly are our use cases for event transport?
>> 	
>> 	Cheers,
>> 
>> 	Matthew
>> 
>> On Dec 20, 2011, at 3:46 PM, Alasdair Allan wrote:
>> 
>>> XMPP/Jabber is pubsub, that's not necessarily the only architecture you want to think about for event transport.
>>> 
>>> Al.
>>> -- 
>>> Sent from my iPad.
>>> 
>>> On 20 Dec 2011, at 23:37, Matthew Graham <mjg at cacr.caltech.edu> wrote:
>>> 
>>>> Hi,
>>>> 
>>>> I guess my reaction is what's wrong with XMPP/Jabber that this solves?
>>>> 
>>>> Cheers,
>>>> 
>>>> Matthew
>>>> 
>>>> On Dec 20, 2011, at 8:11 AM, Roy Williams wrote:
>>>> 
>>>>> As we continue to wrestle with VOEvent transport, new (and simpler) protocols arrive. This looks promising ....
>>>>> 
>>>>> http://www.zeromq.org/
>>>>> 
>>>>> Anyone have any experience with this?
>>>>> Roy
>>>>> 
>>>>> ---
>>>>> Caltech LIGO
>>>>> roy at caltech.edu
>>>>> 626 395 3670
>>>>> 
>>>> 
>>> 
>> 
>