Fall InterOp?
Frederic Hessman
hessman at astro.physik.uni-goettingen.de
Mon Jul 27 14:32:37 PDT 2009
At the risk of making yet another unfulfilled promise (Scheisse
happens), I can't imagine not going the 4 hours to Garching this time.
Rick
On 27 Jul 2009, at 14:00, Rob Seaman wrote:
> The show of hands for ADASS worked so well (that is, it didn't) that
> I thought I would try again :-)
>
> Who is currently planning to attend the Fall IVOA InterOp?
>
> With VAO funding still lagging, and with competing travel to ADASS
> and AAS, it seems likely that folks are going to have to pick and
> choose their trips this Fall.
>
> The VOEvent WG has a lot going on, even if this isn't quite so
> obvious in the depths of the Summer. We're working on the Hotwired
> book (more on that in an upcoming message) and further work on v2.0
> is pending. The project landscape is shifting a bit, but interest
> is certainly not lagging - quite the opposite. All that said, the
> question is what would the cost/benefit be for VOEvent sessions in
> Garching? I think this keys on whether we anticipate a significant
> attendance from VOEvent stakeholders. I've heard from several in
> the U.S. that this likely depends on VAO funding arriving...and the
> clock is ticking loudly. I've heard a solid "no" from one party in
> Europe.
>
> If attendance seems likely to be low, effort might be better spent
> pursuing our current initiatives online and through various other
> meeting opportunities. The Spring InterOp is in Victoria not only
> will be cheaper for U.S. participants, but should see the VAO
> funding issue resolved one way or another.
>
> This risks VOEvent losing its high profile among IVOA attendees, but
> honestly, we don't really seem to have much trouble making a
> spectacle of ourselves...
>
> Comments?
>
> Rob
>
More information about the voevent
mailing list