event identifiers
Ray Plante
rplante at ncsa.uiuc.edu
Fri Apr 15 07:06:38 PDT 2005
Hi VOEvent-ers
On Thu, 14 Apr 2005, Arnold Rots wrote:
> I will comment only on one point - the identifiers.
> I would suggest that maybe the authority for VOEvents should be, well,
> VOEvent which would assign resource Ids to trusted publishers.
> Hence, the identifiers would look like:
>
> ivo://VOEvent/<publisher>#<event id>
As editor of the IVOA Identifier spec, I thought I might offer some
comments on this. Obviously, I've not been in Pasadena for the
workshop, and I've not kept up with the email discussion, so pardon if
some of this is naive.
Remember that the "ivo:" scheme means that there is supposed to be a
record in an IVOA registry describing a resource with that ID (up to but
not including the #). Furthermore, an authority ID--that is, VOEvent, in
this example--is controlled by a single organization. In practical terms,
this means the following:
1. The VOEvent authority ID is registered in an IVOA registry. That
is, there is a record in the registry with the ID "ivo://VOEvent"
and with a publisher set to a registered organization.
2. For an organization to be registered, there is a record in the
registry describing the organization.
So, this scheme essentially says that there is a central organization that
assigns IVOA identifiers to be used to identify events. Who is that
organization going to be? I can see this being appropriate if you are
having all events flow through one event channel; this would give users
only one channel they have to monitor.
cheers,
Ray
More information about the voevent
mailing list