Document location

[Tony Linde]

> current category.  Also, can we create a view in which all 
> documents in all classes appear together?  As it is now, you 
> have to click on each category to find out what's there (at 
> ivoa.net/Documents/).

Good idea. Like:
  http://www.w3.org/TR/

> Do we think this 
> warrants recycling the standards document back through the 
> process?  I would say not. 

No, the process does allow for corrections to be pushed through without
representing the document.

Cheers,
Tony. 

> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-stdproc at eso.org [mailto:owner-stdproc at eso.org] On 
> Behalf Of Robert Hanisch
> Sent: 23 January 2004 16:31
> To: stdproc at ivoa.net
> Cc: ivoadoc at ivoa.net
> Subject: Re: Document location
> 
> 
> Am cc'ing ivoadoc at ivoa.net (Marco) just in case he is not on 
> the stdproc list.
> 
> I agree - we should probably show the documents only in their 
> current category.  Also, can we create a view in which all 
> documents in all classes appear together?  As it is now, you 
> have to click on each category to find out what's there (at 
> ivoa.net/Documents/).
> 
> The mix up on naming conventions is probably my fault, as I 
> was confused by that stuff from the start.  Do we think this 
> warrants recycling the standards document back through the 
> process?  I would say not.  But it will make it necessary to 
> do some cosmetic repair on a couple of the documents already there.
> 
> Bob
> 
> 
> ----- Original Message ----- 
> From: "Tony Linde" <ael at star.le.ac.uk>
> To: <stdproc at ivoa.net>
> Sent: Friday, January 23, 2004 5:49 AM
> Subject: Document location
> 
> 
> > While figuring out how to promote the RM document to PR status, I 
> > noticed that the process standards document was listed in all three 
> > areas (WD, PR and REC). This could be confusing to anyone 
> browsing the 
> > site.
> >
> > I think it might be better to remove old references from 
> the site, so 
> > a document only can be found at its highest level. It is still 
> > possible to
> get
> > at old versions using the references in the header of the document.
> >
> >
> > Also, I thought the 'Latest Version' was supposed to have the form
> NAME.EXT
> > whereas it currently has TYPE-NAME.EXT (though the standard 
> seems to 
> > have lost this instruction from the Naming Convention - teach me to 
> > read
> changes
> > better) which means that this reference to a document will stop 
> > working
> when
> > a document is promoted. I'd like to suggest we use NAME.EXT.
> >
> > Cheers,
> > Tony.
> >
> > __
> > Tony Linde
> > Phone:  +44 (0)116 223 1292    Mobile: +44 (0)7753 603356
> > Fax:    +44 (0)116 252 3311    Email:  ael at star.le.ac.uk
> > Post:   Department of Physics & Astronomy,
> >         University of Leicester
> >         Leicester, UK   LE1 7RH
> >
> > Project Manager,            Director,
> > AstroGrid                   Leicester e-Science Centre
> > http://www.astrogrid.org    http://www.e-science.le.ac.uk/
> >
> >
> >
>