VEP-015: relationship_type#References

Markus Demleitner msdemlei at ari.uni-heidelberg.de
Tue Mar 5 09:33:47 CET 2024


Dear Semantics, dear Registry,

We have a new VEP on the Registry's vocabulary of relationship types,
VEP-015: https://github.com/ivoa-std/VEPs/blob/main/VEP-015.txt.

Here is its text:

  Vocabulary: http://www.ivoa.net/rdf/voresource/relationship_type
  Author: gilles.landais at unistra.fr
  Date: 2022-12-15

  New Term: References
  Action: Addition
  Label: references
  Description: This resource used the related resource as a source of information.

  Used-in: The registry record ivo://edu.gavo.org/hd/gavo_addpms (and most
    other IVOA document records; cf.
    <http://dc.zah.uni-heidelberg.de/wirr/q/ui/fixed?field0=restype&operator0=%3D&operand0=doc%3Adocument>)

  Rationale: This term is proposed to replace the deprecated term "related-to"
    in the registry relationships. In VizieR, "related-to" refers VO resources
    which are linked by their biliographic references.

    For instance, a VizieR catalogue V is attached to a bibliographic reference.
    This article includes in the section "References" citations to other
    articles A1, A2, ... some of them have a VizieR catalogue V1,V2,...
    The proposed relation makes the relation between V and V1,V2,...

    "References"  is a term used in DataCite schema.

Do the WGs have opinions on this?  I'd suggest comments should be
addressed to the Registry mailing list.

Thanks,

          Markus



More information about the semantics mailing list