instr.fov in SSAP
Markus Demleitner
msdemlei at ari.uni-heidelberg.de
Thu Jul 8 14:09:02 CEST 2021
Dear Colleagues,
SSAP 1.1 requires the UCD instr.fov on a few columns (cf. p.66 of
https://ivoa.net/documents/SSA/20120210/REC-SSA-1.1-20120210.pdf).
Trouble is: By UCDList 1.4, instr.fov is a secondary UCD, so the
UCD required by SSA is illegal by UCD.
How do we fix this? I see two ways forward: Either we lift the S
restriction on instr.fov. This would sound reasonable to me and
obviously many others; here's a few counts from today's
rr.table_columns:
instr.fov | 198
instr.fov;instr.pixel | 2475
phys.angsize;instr.fov | 167
pos.angdistance;instr.fov | 16
pos.posang;instr.fov | 12
(these are the most popular ones).
Or we write an erratum to SSAP changing the required UCD to, I think,
phys.angsize;instr.fov .
Me, I don't have much of an opinion, though I have to admit I can't
really say why there's the S on instr.fov.
There is a similar problem in SLAP, where a UCD em.line is required,
which also is S in the UCD list. I'd be a lot more relaxed about
that since I believe SLAP as a whole ought to make room for something
closer to VAMDC.
Thanks,
Markus
More information about the semantics
mailing list