Bargaining in bad faith.. (Was: Re: Plural terms and their multiple definitions

[Rob Seaman]

Bad faith?!?  I'm too much the naif here to attempt coherent  
shenanigans and Alasdair, Norman and Ed are too patient and polite to  
be characterized so.

> Isnt this all reopening old wounds (so to speak). I thought we voted  
> this
> matter closed over a month ago in favor of using Singular terms.

I may have failed to make it clear, but I was attempting to ask a  
different question.  The resulting discussion has been useful.  Thanks  
to all involved.

> If we continue to contravene overall sentiment and reopen these sort  
> of
> issues, then we will indeed be like the DM group of past years and get
> very little done.

I dunno.  The frisson betwixt VOEvent and Semantics has seemed quite  
productive.  It takes something like the U.S. Congress to contravene  
overall sentiment, but my apologies if I've contravened your own.

Rob
--

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://www.ivoa.net/pipermail/semantics/attachments/20080211/3e238ab8/attachment-0001.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: blindf1.jpg
Type: image/jpeg
Size: 26043 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://www.ivoa.net/pipermail/semantics/attachments/20080211/3e238ab8/attachment-0001.jpg>