SV: do we need it?

Brian Thomas thomas at astro.umd.edu
Fri Sep 14 13:00:55 PDT 2007


On Friday 14 September 2007 3:31:43 pm Tony Linde wrote:
> I would argue against the SV containing any structure though, so use
> cosmicBackground and not cosmology.cosmicBackground.
> 

I would second that point of view..and go further to state that the terms should 
be disjoint as well (perhaps SKOS inforces this, but its not the case in OWL).

-=brian



More information about the semantics mailing list