IAU thesaurus in RDF (an update)
Ed Shaya
eshaya at umd.edu
Thu Oct 4 12:50:20 PDT 2007
Just some quick comments on the IAU.rdf:
Missing ZZ_Ceti_star concept definition, something like this:
<skos:Concept rdf:about="#ZZ_Ceti_stars">
<skos:inScheme rdf:resource=""/>
<skos:prefLabel>ZZ Cetus stars</skos:prefLabel>
<skos:altLabel>ZZ Ceti stars</skos:altLabel>
<skos:definition>ZZ Ceti stars</skos:definition>
</skos:Concept>
I don't understand why there are so many TopConcepts, most of which have
many layers of broader things above it.
For instance _21_cm_line is a top concept, yet broader is
radio_recombination_lines, broader is recombination_lines, broader is
emission_lines, broader is specral_lines. I would perhaps accept
spectral_lines as a TopConcept.
By the way it is real easy to see these details in the OWL version.
Just add the the line
<owl:Ontology rdf:about=""> </owl:Ontology>
I also added
xmlns:IAU="http://www.Astro.physik.Uni-Goettingen.DE/~hessman/rdf/IAU#"
xml:base="http://www.Astro.physik.Uni-Goettingen.DE/~hessman/rdf/IAU"
so that I could delete the http:.... in every line, reduces the size by
a good amount.
Ed
Frederic V. Hessman wrote:
> On 4 Oct 2007, at 3:59 pm, Alasdair Gray wrote:
>> Hi Rick,
>>
>> I just tried to access the rdf version of your file
>> http://www.astro.physik.uni-goettingen.de/~hessman/rdf/IAU.rdf but got
>> an error message back.
>>
>> In case you are not aware, there is an rdf validation service
>> available from the W3C from http://www.w3.org/RDF/Validator/. I ran
>> the URL through this service but I'm not sure how useful the output is.
>
> Alasdair found the problem (an unclosed <skos:ConceptScheme>) and it has
> been fixed. The w3 validator was perfectly happy with the syntax of
> the new RDF file.
>
> On 4 Oct 2007, at 3:37 pm, Andrea Preite Martinez wrote:
>
>> A few minor things (just rapidly browsing through):
>>
>> -SPH means "smooth" or "smoothed" part. hd
>
> Whoops - I knew that!
>
>> -Temperature has NT electron_temperature
>
> Done.
>
>> - post_AGB absent
>
> Done. There are undoubtably more corrections to be made. Please
> ignore the BT's, NT's, and RT's for now and see if your favorite words
> have been included.
>
>> -AGN : for the ontology we asked a specialist to give us a detailed
>> up-to-date AGN taxonomy. That part has to be "refreshed"! I can pass
>> you the file.
>
> Will be happy to update, but again - let's concentrate on the tokens.
>
> Rick
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Dr. Frederic V. Hessman Hessman at Astro.physik.Uni-Goettingen.DE
> Institut für Astrophysik Tel. +49-551-39-5052
> Friedrich-Hund-Platz 1 Fax +49-551-39-5043
> 37077 Goettingen Room F04-133
> http://www.Astro.physik.Uni-Goettingen.de/~hessman
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> MONET: a MOnitoring NEtwork of Telescopes
> http://monet.Uni-Goettingen.de
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>
>
>
More information about the semantics
mailing list