Mark II vocabularies

[Alasdair Gray]

Hi,

Following Rick's distribution of his skos version of the UCD tokens, I
found an error in my own version. I have now corrected this. The new
version is available from
http://explicator.dcs.gla.ac.uk/Vocabularies/UCD1-v1.0.rdf

Unlike Rick, I have not added in fake tokens. Thus, I have 

Vocabulary	Concepts	Top Concepts	Notes
===============================================
UCD1		473		12			Format of URIs
is all lower case

Cheers,

Alasdair

Alasdair J G Gray
Research Associate: Explicator Project
http://explicator.dcs.gla.ac.uk
Computer Science, University of Glasgow
0141 330 6292


-----Original Message-----
From: owner-semantics at eso.org [mailto:owner-semantics at eso.org] On Behalf
Of Frederic V. Hessman
Sent: 14 November 2007 17:34
To: IVOA semantics
Subject: Mark II vocabularies

Following Alaisdairs suggestion, I went back and cleaned up the  
script so that it is used uniformly for all vocabularies.  Now, the  
only difference between any of them is the RDFROOT= and RDFPATH=  
settings in the makefile.  The total number of concepts and the total  
number of "TopConcepts" arbitrarily defined as the number of concepts  
with NT links but no BT links (i.e. no orphan concepts) is displayed.

To earn another beer, I also stuck in the UCD1 vocabulary, where the  
UCD root tokens indeed end up being the TopConcepts.  Note that I had  
to stick in two fake UCD roots to cover the cases  
phys.particle.neutrino and something else, requiring that there  
always be a parent separated only by one period.

The current bottom line is

	Vocabulary		Concepts	"Top" Concepts	Notes
	
----------------------------------------------------------------------- 
------------------------------------------------------------------------

--
	IAU93			2551		265
down from 512, albeit by definition
	IVOAT			2891		273
after all, the elements are more than 100 all  
by themselves
	UCD1			475			12
2 entries are fake!!!
	math			1318		15
taken from MathWords.com
	
----------------------------------------------------------------------- 
------------------------------------------------------------------------

--

Try http://www.astro.physik.uni-goettingen.de/~hessman/rdf/  and enjoy!

Rick