Trouble with a deprecated default

[Henrik Norman]

Hi all,

I see no major issues with option b.

Cheers,
Henrik Norman
Euro-VO Registry

On Mon, Feb 3, 2025 at 3:00 PM Markus Demleitner via registry <
registry at ivoa.net> wrote:

> Dear Gilles,
>
> On Mon, Feb 03, 2025 at 10:37:44AM +0100, gilles landais via registry
> wrote:
> > Thank you to take into account DataCite-IVOA compatibility.
> >
> > I agree that "Collected" sounds enough generic to be used. So (b) sounds
> > acceptable to reduce compatibility problem and to manage the existing.
> >
> > I don't know how the Date role is used in the registry. Are there exotic
> > values ?
>
> There shouldn't be, but the RofR validator does not yet evaluate the
> vocabularies (shame on me).  In reality, here's what roles we have
> according to RegTAP (where "representative" already shows up as
> "collected" according to RegTAP's policy of honouring the
> vocabularies' UseInstead triples):
>
>
> +-----------------------+-------+
> | value_role            | n     |
> +-----------------------+-------+
> | updated               | 27594 |
> | created               | 26711 |
> | collected             | 1175  |
> | release               | 96    |
> | inspected             | 41    |
> | exportrequested       | 10    |
> | authority established | 1     |
> | availability          | 1     |
> | project end           | 1     |
> | project start         | 1     |
> +-----------------------+-------+
>
> > According to the existent, is it possible to force the role value with a
> > controlled vocabulary?
>
> Well, it's what VOResource says, so Records using either of the four
> terms with just one match are VOResource-invalid.  But then,
> invalidity at a level of 10^-4 is really, really good in this
> business...
>
> Thanks,
>
>           Markus
>
> (who will now do the change to the VOResource schema)
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.ivoa.net/pipermail/registry/attachments/20250204/ba601269/attachment.htm>