RI 1.0 test Registry

[KevinBenson]

Just to follow up on my last e-mail.   I was wrong the OAI from RofR is 
correct since it does a xmlns="".

cheers,
Kevin

KevinBenson wrote:
> Some in line comments.  Ray see my first paragraph about RofR and oai 
> namespace.
>
> Ray Plante wrote:
>> Hey Kevin,
>>
>> On Mon, 10 Jul 2006, KevinBenson wrote:
>>  
>>> Located at the below url you will find a test registry that conforms 
>>> to 1.0.  Feel free to try out various jsp pages, you can use the 
>>> external** pages (bottom of menu) to see the full SOAP message 
>>> coming back.     
>>
>> Excellent!  I'm working on the client search library now.
>>
>>  
>>> OAI url as you can see from the Registry Type is:
>>> http://msslxt.mssl.ucl.ac.uk:8080/astrogrid-regtest-1_0/OAIHandlerv1_0
>>>     
>>
>> This is looking good.  (Mind if I use it to test my validater? ;-)
>>   
> Sure go for it, let me know if I have missed anything :)  Possible 
> Note for those implementors with OAI using 3rd party tools, take a 
> close look at the OAI namespace several times they put a default 
> namespace at the top.  Now that we don't use namespaces for our 
> Resource if you look at the  OAI it's as if the Resource element takes 
> on the oai namespace :(   I had to modify the 3rd party tool I was 
> using.  I believe the RofR you have Ray is also putting a default 
> namespace, but when I harvest I tend to not look at it.  Just Noting 
> this because it could be a potential problem.
>> I was able to discover your Search WebService interface; however, 
>> it's not returning a WSDL via ?wsdl.    
> Ahha many thanks yes I had some paths all messed up since I pull wsdls 
> and schemas from jars.  It should be corrected now and I ran a 
> WSDL2java with axis and it seemed to go.
>>  
>>> Final Note the adqls->adqlx is a much older translation I am now 
>>> trying to work in the 1.0 version.  You should be able to still send 
>>> 0.7.4, 0.9, and 1.0 type adqlx to the registry.
>>>     
>>
>> So I'm having trouble supporting ADQL v1.0; there doesn't seem to be 
>> a valid schema file ready yet.  What are you using for an ADQL schema 
>> (which is why I was groping for your WSDL)?  Is it the same as 
>> http://www.ivoa.net/xml/ADQL/v1.0?
>>   
> Yes there was a time I saw a ADQL v1.0 (granted I think it was just 
> 0.9 and the namespace changed).  But having a little trouble finding 
> it on the ivoa website.   I believe Aurelien put up a xsl for 
> adqlx->sql if anybodys interested (same location as the RI spec) . You 
> can see mine here:
> http://msslxt.mssl.ucl.ac.uk:8080/astrogrid-regtest-1_0/schema/adql/ADQL/v1.0/ADQL.xsd 
>
>
> cheers,
> Kevin
>> I'm going to see if I can make the best of what's there...
>>
>>  
>>> Also Ray your samples were mostly good, had one type of validation 
>>> error with xerces (maybe you might know on how to fix that):
>>> cvc-id.2: There are multiple occurrences of ID value 'UTC-FK5-TOPO'.
>>> cvc-attribute.3: The value 'UTC-FK5-TOPO' of attribute 'id' on 
>>> element 'AstroCoordSystem' is not valid with respect to its type, 'ID'.
>>>     at 
>>> org.astrogrid.test.AstrogridAssert$AstrogridAssertDefaultHandler.endDocument(AstrogridAssert.java:344) 
>>>
>>>     at 
>>> org.apache.xerces.parsers.AbstractSAXParser.endDocument(Unknown Source)
>>>     
>>
>> Hmm.  I'm not seein' this using Xerces.  Which file was it?  I just 
>> rechecked the ones posted at RegUpgradeSummer2006 (including the 
>> individual ones and the one's in the tar/zip balls) and they came up 
>> fine.  Do you have the latest? 
>> cheers,
>> Ray
>>
>>