Mistakes in registry
Guy Rixon
gtr at ast.cam.ac.uk
Mon Feb 6 07:04:27 PST 2006
Ray,
your validator seems to have some problems. It's just told me this
http://nvo.ncsa.uiuc.edu:8081/validate/ConeSearchValidater?BASEURL=http%3A%2F%2Fag03.ast.cam.ac.uk%3A8080%2Ffirst-dsa%2FSubmitCone%3F&RA=180.0&DEC=20.0&SR=1.0&FORMAT=html&show=fail&show=warn&show=rec&show=pass
implying that the resource/table structure is wrong. However, this direct
call to the service
http://ag03.ast.cam.ac.uk:8080/first-dsa/SubmitCone?RA=180&DEC=20&SR=1
seems to have exactly one resource containing eactly one table.
Does the validator do VOTable 1.1?
Cheers,
Guy
On Fri, 3 Feb 2006, Ray Plante wrote:
> Hi J-Christophe,
>
> > I have remarked that in the registry there are some mistakes. For
> > example, sometimes the "?" is missed when the serviceURL has not ARGS
> > and sometimes the "&" is missed too when ARGS are indicated.
>
> > What do you think about a validation service ?
>
> You've definitely touched on an real problem right now in the VO. At the
> moment, addressing the quality of registry information is a top issues in
> the NVO at the moment, and we're plugging away at it. Just to give you a
> quick summary of how things are going:
>
> * this last year, the IVOA Registry WG adopted a mechanism that allows
> registries to rate the compliance level and quality of a registry
> records. This is to be coupled with a practive of feeding this
> information back to publishers so that they can be corrected.
>
> * the NVO has been under going the arduous, manual process of reviewing
> the records, correcting mistakes where we can or contacting
> publishers where it is not appropriate.
>
> * We've been developing validators. The first completed one for
> Conesearch services (beta) can be found at
>
> http://nvo.ncsa.uiuc.edu/VO/services/csvalidate.html
>
> This validator has been run on all know ConeSearch services; the
> results can be viewed at:
>
> http://nvo.ncsa.uiuc.edu/VO/services/csinventory/summary.html
>
> A SIA validator is nearing completion; this will be followed by a
> registry service validator.
>
> Your feedback on any particular records would be very helpful. You should
> contact either the contact person listed in the record, or the
> contact for the registry that you received the record from.
>
> > Of course, I can check myself if the serviceURL is valid and add the '?'
> > or '&' missing in my program. But I consider that if we have a norm
> > describing well syntax, it is pitty to not use it and to have spent so
> > time to build a norm which is not respected.
>
> Many clients and services have had to resort to fixing these URLs on the
> fly.
>
> > So, I think it is very easy to check some fields like serviceURL. The
> > other ones, I don't know because I miss some documentation. For example,
> > I don't know where the different values of ResourceType fields are
> > defined ? if it is possible to add others ones or not by a user ? I
> > don't know what is the difference between SIAP, SIAP/ARCHIVE and
> > SimpleImageAccess ?
>
> Sounds like you are using the STScI registry. If you use the interactive
> web interface, you will see things like SIAP and SIAP/ARCHIVE. This is
> some what of a historical artifact and not part of the standard interface,
> as it were. SIAP simply labels a SimpleImageAccess service; SIAP/ARCHIVE
> refers to a a SimpleImageAccess service whose ImageServiceType metadatum
> is set to "Pointed" (I believe). It's probably not documented, and we
> should probably take it out.
>
> The definitions of all the *core* concepts described in the resource
> record are defined in the standard document, Resource Metadata for the VO
> (http://www.ivoa.net/Documents/PR/ResMetadata/RM-20051115.html). Another
> document that is specificly defines the ResourceType is in the works;
> however, documentation for all of the (emerging) standard
> schemas--including definitions of the terms--can be found inside the
> schema files, all of which are available at
> http://www.ivoa.net/xml/. Metadata that are specific to services like SIA
> can/should be found in the service's respective standard document (e.g.
> http://www.ivoa.net/Documents/WD/SIA/sia-20040524.html).
>
> hope this helps,
> Ray
>
>
Guy Rixon gtr at ast.cam.ac.uk
Institute of Astronomy Tel: +44-1223-337542
Madingley Road, Cambridge, UK, CB3 0HA Fax: +44-1223-337523
More information about the registry
mailing list