Slots in Kyoto

[Christophe ARVISET]

Ray

In your presentation at ADASS 2004 
(http://adass.ipac.caltech.edu/Presentations/Tuesday/Plante_O7_1.ppt#33), 
VGs #33-34 mentioned the issue about registry curation. You mentioned that 
many of the existing registry entries are not declared properly and 
therefore could not be a real use for a VO application/client who would 
like to make use of them.

I believe that it would be time to tackle this issue and that it would be 
worth discussing this at Kyoto.

Would you agree ?


Cheers

Christophe

At 19:40 01/03/2005, Ray Plante wrote:
>Hi Tony,
>
>On Tue, 22 Feb 2005, Tony Linde wrote:
> >  Session 1: Registering applications
> >           + other Registry extensions/amendments
> >  Session 2: Registry interface
> >           + Registry Query
> >  Session 3: Registry data model
> >           + Registering data quality 'indicators'
> >           + Plans for V1.0
>
>I do plan to attend this meeting.  Your general schedule breakdown looks
>good to me.  A couple of questions of clarification...
>
>   o  I'm unsure what "Registering applications" refers to; is this
>      the CEA model?  (We should definitely hear about this.)
>
>   o  "other Registry extensions/amendments":  do you see this being mainly
>      in the form of extensions/amendments to schemas, or might it include
>      interface and architecture issues?
>
>Here are some specific things I think we need to talk about and can be fit
>into your general categories:
>
>   Data Model Stuff:
>     *  Move standardization process forward for the VOResource core
>           schema.
>     *  Integration of STC into the VODataService schema
>     *  Updating the VORegistry schema to support the Registry Interface
>           spec.
>   Registry Interface:
>     *  Remaining issues with RI spec before presentation as PR
>
>All of these items require a certain amount of prep work to happen on the
>list ahead of time.  For example, Kevin & I have been making another pass
>at the RI spec; we'll bring up some issues for discussion on the list
>soon.  I'm also preparing some documents on VOResource necessary for
>moving the standardization process forward.
>
> > And which other workgroup sessions should we avoid? As a workgroup, I'd
> > suggest we should attend the DM Catalogue model session. Any others
> > important to the workgroup as a whole?
> >
> > (Personally I'd like to attend the VOQL session but don't think it is
> > critical to the workgroup.)
>
>I would like to attend the VOQL session.  Our adoption of ADQL for
>querying registries last year required some minor changes to the ADQL
>spec; it would be good to keep a connection going between our groups as
>these standards progress.
>
>cheers,
>Ray



Cheers

Christophe

--- Christophe ARVISET
--- European Space Agency (ESA)
--- European Space Astronomy Centre (ESAC)
--- Research and Scientific Support Department (RSSD)
--- Science Operations and Data Systems Division (SCI-SD)
--- Urb. Villafranca del Castillo
--- P.O. Box 50727, 28080 Madrid - SPAIN.
--- Tel: +34 91 813 12 78, Fax: +34 91 813 11 72
--- E-mail : Christophe.Arviset at esa.int