Meeting

[Andre Schaaff]

Hello everybody,

A face to face meeting would be very nice for dicussions.
A telecon is perhaps not the best way to initiate the work.
But it is just what i mean.

regards

André

Robert Hanisch wrote:

> Hi Tony, et al.  The other option is to work first by telecon, then use the
> week of May 12-16, when we have already planned to have various technical
> WGs meet prior to a joint session on May 15-16 in Cambridge, UK.
>
> Other opinions?
>
> Bob
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Tony Linde" <ael at star.le.ac.uk>
> To: "'Registry_Ivoa_List'" <registry at ivoa.net>
> Sent: Sunday, February 09, 2003 11:11 AM
> Subject: Meeting
>
> > I was going to set up a telecon to discuss issues relating to the
> > Registry. Then I wondered if it might be better to have a face-to-face
> > meeting first followed by one- or two-weekly telecons.
> >
> > It would need to be soon to get the ball rolling and I was going to
> > suggest somewhere in London in mid-March (Elizabeth could probably
> > arrange a meeting room somewhere at UCL) since the date is fairly soon
> > and London is relatively central between US and Europe and easy to get
> > to.
> >
> > So, what do people think? Face-to-face meeting or telecon to kick off?
> > (Possible agendas for each listed below.)
> >
> > Cheers,
> > Tony.
> >
> > __
> > Tony Linde                       Phone:  +44 (0)116 223 1292
> > AstroGrid Project Manager        Fax:    +44 (0)116 252 3311
> > Dept of Physics & Astronomy      Mobile: +44 (0)7753 603356
> > University of Leicester          Email:  ael at star.le.ac.uk
> > Leicester, UK   LE1 7RH          Web:    http://www.astrogrid.org
> >
> > ========================
> >
> > As for an agenda for a face-to-face meeting, I was thinking of:
> >
> > 1. Registry options (presentations):
> > 1.1 OAI
> > 1.2 GLU
> > 1.3 WS-I & UDDI
> > 1.4 JINI
> > 1.5 ?? - some grid-based registry/ies
> > 1.6 ?? - agent-based technology/ies
> >
> > 2. Identification options (presentations):
> > 2.1 ...
> >
> > 3. Scope of IVOA Registry standards (discussion)
> > 3.1 Vision
> > 3.2 Specifications required
> >
> > 4. Linking IVOA to Astro & Grid standards
> > 4.1 FIPS, etc
> > 4.2 Globus, GGF, etc
> >
> > 5. Use Cases
> > 5.1 Brainstorm registry functional subdivisions
> > 5.2 Working groups to develop use cases for each subdivision
> >
> > 5. Organisation & Roadmap (discussion)
> > 5.1 Meetings & Telecons
> > 5.2 Schedule
> > 5.3 Publishable roadmap
> >
> > With the extent of the agenda, we'll probably need two days.
> >
> > ===============================
> >
> > If we cannot do a face-to-face meeting, the agenda for the first telecon
> > could be something like:
> >
> > 1. Registry options:
> > 1.1 list of possible options
> > 1.2 volunteers to write paper on each option
> > 1.3 deadlines for each paper
> >
> > 2. Scope of IVOA Registry standards
> > 2.1 brief discussion
> > 2.2 volunteer to write Vision document
> > 2.3 volunteer to write Scope and draft specs list
> >
> > 3. Use cases
> > 3.1 list of functional areas
> > 3.2 volunteers to form working groups to develop use cases per area
> > 3.3 deadlines for each use case set
> >
> > 4. Organisation and roadmap
> > 4.1 meetings and telecons: schedule
> > 4.2 items for roadmap
> >
> > The following few meetings will be a matter of putting more detail on
> > the Scope and Options documents, then reviewing the use cases and then
> > working on the standards.
> >
> > The identification issue needs to be raised as well but may need more
> > bouncing around on the mailing list before we're at a point of having
> > options to discuss.
> >
> >