DM Running Meeting notes - 20250916
Kelle Cruz
kellecruz at gmail.com
Thu Oct 30 20:18:58 CET 2025
Regarding TODO for Spectrum and DATE-BEG/END: What *was* decided in
Baltimore? Happy to help with this if needed.
Kelle
On Thu, Oct 30, 2025 at 2:17 PM CresitelloDittmar, Mark via dm <dm at ivoa.net>
wrote:
>
> Attendees:
>
> - MS, MCD, LM, PD, ML, TD
>
>
> Agenda:
>
> - Roadmap Goals:
> - MANGO 1.0:
> - In RFC: https://wiki.ivoa.net/twiki/bin/view/IVOA/Mango10RFC
> - comments from DCP only
> - observation time is complex object; proposal to replace
> the 1 object with type attribute
> - LM exercised it, works with vo-dml
> - Merge request is open:
> - *ACTION: MCD- review merge request and then LM can
> move forward*
> - datalink class
> - added at beginning of document for static URLs;
> - everyone is implementing datalink and it is
> recommended to remove the class from the model.
> - no replacement
> - working implementation on Simbad
> - TD: any potential issues? or looking good?
> - LM: very simple to provide cone search annotated;
> code is ready on his machine.. in discussion with Simbad people to put into
> production
> - possible interop presentation APPS
> - CAOM2.5
> - PD: over summer has spent time on CAOM document (2/3 done)
> - should have time in next week or 2 to finish (end-of-month)
> == ready to publish to document repo
> - no time to dig into TD and HE extensions; anticipates HE to
> be an effort
> - PD: Question
> - serialization of model (in XSD), this was part of the spec
> itself.
> - have XSD, and json serialization (not schema)…
> - ML: Mango does not have a schema.. serialization is
> expected to be via Annotation syntax.
> - TD: should be brought up in the TCG.
> - with multiple formats.. have to be all the more careful
> and they NEED to be in sync.
> - Q: is there a place in ivoa.net. for the json schema.?
> - PD.. goals (last meeting)
> - Document status?
> - *TOPIC: Markup in VO-DML .. need a policy for this in DM
> Working Group.*
> - *no progress on that with PH*
> - *Goals From Last meeting:*
> - finish document
> - review work Severin did, query CAOM holding CDC/MAST,
> determine which fields in use in various fractions.. to identify usage
> level of current fields..
> - inform possible deprecations.
> - new version of document in early summer
> - working forward from there.. RFC for Fall seems viable
> from document standpoint, but will need a lot of attention/review from
> community.
> - ObsCore 1.2 / Extensions:
> - ML: had some comments from radio partners which are inserted
> into the doc and a new version is available.
> - ready to go for TCG review. (unofficial).
> - *ACTION: touch base on how to proceed.*
> - HEIG Note:
> - CXC added X-Ray use cases
> - MS/Bruno added (July) some content from Cherencov << on Git
> repo. reviewing/integratiing comments from IE
> - are vocabularies involved (non-ObsCore)
> - IRF/RSF dependencies
> - 3 Sections:
> - ObsCore as now (with tweaked definitions)
> - Extension Content for HE
> - …
> - ML:
> - CfA group wants to distribute every file of interest, along
> with event list
> - discussing point that it is difficult to characterize
> advanced data products..
> - these are not direct observational data products - going
> this way will make for very complex queries in ObsCore and therefoe not
> serving the interests/intent of ObsCore.
> - Do not see a clear use case for when searching for advanced
> product (probability dist.) what path does the query take?
> - from Observation (date/target) => see all analysis
> products
> - or direct query of the products
> - DM WG Task
> - Discuss where the proper place for their ‘proposals’ as
> - TD: clarifying question
> - the use cases themselves are describing a query which does
> not start with the observation?
> - PD: observable axis is a quite different thing in these
> advanced products.. so maybe not obscore
> - MIreille
> - working modelio modeling
> - would like to see some types in the Template (UCD, Units)
> - for VO-DML 1.1: has the ivoa model extended to include these?
> - PD: paul has integrated some of these into the ivoa model?
> - ML: how do we proceed? Do we suggest extensions? This
> should be distributed with vo-dml?
> - PD: some add to ivoa base model (so trivial to reuse). Suggests
> we try that and see how that works.
> - Has some available.. can add as pull request for Vo-dml
> - Spectrum
> - file Erratum for VOCLASS issue
> - follow-up on action for DATE-OBS issue: proposed additions of
> DATE-BEG/END for alternative representation of this concept.
> - *TODO: Implement what was decided in Baltimore. (MCD)MS, *
> - Next Meeting:
> - 3rd Tues = Oct 21 @20:00
>
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.ivoa.net/pipermail/dm/attachments/20251030/cedc2b81/attachment-0001.htm>
More information about the dm
mailing list