[Obscore1.1] WD comments
Laurent MICHEL
laurent.michel at astro.unistra.fr
Mon Jul 13 14:45:19 CEST 2015
Hello,
I do not think that t_dim is better suited than e_dim or s_dim to
specify the number of events. Finally, an event is just a point within a
4dims space (S1/S2/E/T) and none of these axes has a special role.
Considering that, I think the number of events should be reported in all
*_dim columns. The ambiguity about binned axes or not is removed by the
appropriate "dataproduct_type" value.
Laurent
Le 25/06/2015 03:06, Douglas Tody a écrit :
> On Wed, 24 Jun 2015, CresitelloDittmar, Mark wrote:
>> pg 25: Axes dimensions
>> Outside of the pixelated image context, what values do these hold?
>> For example, the sparse cube (ie: event list). do each of these hold
>> the #events? or are s_dim1,s_dim2 == the span along that axis? and
>> if so, in what frame?
>> It seems that #events is closest to the description as the number of
>> samples.
>
> For event data which is not imaged, such as an event list, probably the
> best one can do is have t_dim specify the number of events. The spatial
> coverage would be specified with s_fov and the spectral coverage with
> em_min/max. The binning on the spatial and spectral axes is meaningless
> and should be zero. If a precomputed image for the observation is also
> provided, that would have all the dim values and would share the same
> obs_id.
>
> - Doug
--
---- Laurent MICHEL Tel (33 0) 3 68 85 24 37
Observatoire de Strasbourg Fax (33 0) 3 68 85 24 32
11 Rue de l'Universite Mail laurent.michel at astro.unistra.fr
67000 Strasbourg (France) Web http://astro.u-strasbg.fr/~michel
---
More information about the dm
mailing list