UCD for query
Mcglynn, Thomas A. (GSFC-6601)
Thomas.A.McGlynn at NASA.gov
Tue Oct 21 19:52:51 CEST 2014
That's interesting. Generally we've found that some quantitative
description of the energy min/max is more useful than arbitrary bands.
In the optical where there are a fair number of conventional response
curves such labels may make more sense, i.e., U, V, ... colors. But the
UCD em coverage in HEA bands is pretty limited -- only three ranges in
the X-ray and we have 'hard' gamma-rays that are a few percent of the
minimum energy detectable by Fermi much less Cherenkov telescopes and
the like. So there's not really useful resolution using just UCDs.
Roy Williams wrote:
> On 10/21/14, 7:48 AM, Mcglynn, Thomas A. (GSFC-6601) wrote:
> > More seriously, I'd be interested in how others have been finding value
> > in carefully defined UCDs.
> We are using UCD's in LIGO-land for the electromagnetic followup
> program. Those astronomers who will do follow-up of a LIGO
> gravitational wave event are expected to report, including the EM band
> in which the observations were taken, for which we are using the em.*
> stem from UCD.
> Caltech LIGO
> roy at caltech.edu
> 626 395 3670
More information about the dm